Simulation Argument

The simulation argument was authored by Nick Bostrom and asserts that one of three propositions must be true:

  1. Almost all civilizations go extinct before reaching a state of technological maturity required to run a convincing ancestor simulation.
  2. A civilization will lose interest in creating an ancestor simulation.
  3. We are almost certainly living in a computer simulation.

If propositions #1 and #2 are not true, then there is an estimated probability factor of between 20% to 50% that we are living in a simulation. Although it should be noted that this probability factor has very little basis in science. If we are living in a simulation then there is a higher probability that you are one of the simulated people whether than one of the exceptional non-simulated people.

While there is evidence that supports the simulation hypothesis, we do not know which of these 3 propositions are true. The following video features an interview with Nick Bostrom as conducted by Adam Ford at the Future of Humanity Institute Oxford University.

Subscription expired — please renew

Pro account upgrade has expired for this site and the site is now locked. If you are the master administrator for this site, please renew your subscription or delete your outstanding sites or stored files, so that your account fits in the free plan.